Such a great brand.

I couldnt resist making it the first story in my last book (& do check that Cannes award winning confessions website).

It's sort of the innocent of the US. And I heard it is coming to Europe in a big way too. I think Adam Morgan possibly works with them/knows them btw if you want an insider commentary.

For me the brand is all about not accepting that mundane, everyday and useful has to be boring. Yes its good for the world (and thats really important) but it also has more charisma and relevance than most fashion/gadget/sports brands.

Another thing I saw once in the same vein was a joint fashion/clothing detergent brand in Tokyo. They sold persil type products. they also sold funky denimwear & tshirts saying things like 'fuck housework'. Admittedly it was prob a bit of a joke but it also shows the potential of simply refusing to be fmcg-dull.

:J

ps what would your four rings thing be for the new apple phone? Do pop by & comment.

ps looks like you have been working on your own p(rop)osition

QUOTE: Radical thinking about the future of advertising and the brand advice business

the second bit is new right?

(perhaps you now need to call it Baadliterate? ;)

You ad guys!! Always looking for the flash - I'll order from the States - solution when a 30 second perusal of the website yields this

http://www.methodhome.com/pad/news_record.php?news_id=6

Send one of your interns out immediately!

Though, I wouldn't be surprised if there's a disparity between their promise of UK distribution and the reality.

Mr Dodds I have been trying to order through their UK on line store but there is a problem in recognising credit cards and the delivery costs double the order value seemingly regardless of volume.

You had me at the first picture. I want them in my home.

They will genuinely make a positive difference to my life. I use Ecover because I think I should, but everyday when I look at the washing up bottle and it depresses me. It looks grubby, worthy and sad.

I love the idea that dirty = not beautiful/not bright/not happy or guilty (in an environmental sense).

No no Richard - there are UK stockists for this stuff - that was why I left the link.

Quote: "In part of course this is because many of Method's customers will have a rather casual relationship with the cleaning leaving that to the cleaner that they employ for the purpose."

Although most of your analysis is on point, this point made me laugh! I think you over-estimate how high up-stream these Method products really are. Here in Canada, they are available at the drugstore, and they aren't very expensive. I think you missed this point. Method products aren't like "salon exclusive" shampoos, they're just the high-end of the drugstore varieties. That fits perfectly with the Karim Rashid "cheap'n'funky" design. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a toilet to scrub.

I vote for Method a local San Francisco firm.

Eric is a great guy and an ex-planner.

He presented at a conference we hosted a couple of years ago

The spark for the company came from looking at the packaging for household cleaning products and how the form hadn't changed for 30 years. Everyone was using the same PET container.

They thought what if the packaging could be cool and people instead of hiding them under sinks wanted to display them?

They went out and hired Karim Raschid to design their first pack and went from there.

Hi. Another Canadian here. To add to Justin's comment what Method has done is to take commodity household cleaners and build brand values not through mass media but through the product itself by adding packaging design values and environmental responsibility values - at a price comparable to so called leading household brands.


So rather than using advertising to convince you the shopper it is a more worthy product than the competitor beside it on the shelf, they invested in making the prodcut better than the one beside the shelf - both aesthetically (it'll look good sitting in public beside my kitchen sink) and environmentally (I can sleep at night because I'm not killing fish nor slowly poisoning my children.)


But take away the rational "environmentally responsible" without a premium price aspect - as a brand idea People Against Dirty is fantastic. I love it and am envious of it. I wished all the brands I worked for stood for something so true and pure they could carry such a pithy and authentic premise.


PS amazon.com ships the products globally. I recommend the peppermint vanilla countertop spritz.

PPS Titles are generally quite meaningless but recently we received a note from someone in their marketing department with the title Media Provocateur. Nice to see a client formally dictate dissension and agitation as part of their job, but somehow I think Method does this in a productive way than most.

Method are marvellous. I met Eric last year and he is one bright chap. I imagine they're going to do really well in the UK. And why wouldn't they? They look good and they don't screw the planet. Just imagine how many units a good looking Prius might shift.

I've been hooked on their entire range since spotting their dish soap in Target (the perfect initial mass stockist I think )

I agree with all the above - great brand idea, great people and a local SF success story.

But Ed Cotton hit the nail on the head: the insight and a lot of the success is due to the cool packaging and the fact that people want to display it. In fact, I would guess that the majority of the people who buy it don't know anything about "people against dirty".

However the CP+B ads doesn't do it for me at all. There is one visual in one of the broschures where something is starting to happend - the one with the people cleaning the outdoors. People against dirty is really good but need to be dramatized alot more.

I just don't understand the obsession with household cleaning products. I am sure I'm bombarded with adverts on a daily basis as often as I am photographed on CCTV camera. Are we all really surrounded in a pool of filth?